| ADDITIONAL MENUS |
| EDITORIAL BOARD |
| REVIEWER |
| FOCUS AND SCOPE |
| AUTHOR GUIDELINES |
| PUBLICATION ETHICS |
| ABOUT PUBLISHING SYSTEM |
| OPEN ACCESS POLICY |
| COPYRIGHT NOTICE |
| PLAGIARISM POLICY |
| TEMPLATE |
| VISITOR |
Peer Review Policy
Peer Review Policy
Publication of articles in Molang: Journal Islamic Education is dependent solely on scientific validity and coherence as judged by our editors and/or peer reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is comprehensible and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. Molang: Journal Of Islamic Education acknowledged the effort and suggestions made by its reviewers. Each article in our journal is reviewed by an average of two reviewers.
Initial evaluation of manuscripts
The Editor will first evaluate all manuscripts submitted. Although rare, yet it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the Molang: Journal Of Islamic Education. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts for review.
Type of peer review
Review process employs a double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa.
Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates the already published works, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. Other rounds of review processes would be done should the first round is inadequate.
Review reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
Is original by stating the objectives and gap clearly
Is methodologically sound
Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
Has results/findings which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
Correctly references previous relevant work
Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.
Decision
Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editors decision is final.
Becoming a Reviewer
If you are not currently a reviewer for Molang: Journal Islamic Education, but would like to be added to the list of reviewers, please contact us (WA: 082336007694 and e-mail: jurnalmolang@gmail.com). The benefits of reviewing for Molang: Journal Of Islamic Education include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in related research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in our list of reviewers. You may also be able to cite your work for Molang: Journal Islamic Education as part of your professional development requirements.
